Microneedling and Fraxel treatments are two popular non-invasive skin rejuvenation procedures that have become increasingly popular in recent years. You can use both treatments to address a variety of skin concerns, including wrinkles, fine lines, hyperpigmentation, and acne scars. However, there are differences between the two treatments. When you understand these differences, you can decide which treatment is best suited for your skin.
Microneedling, also known as collagen induction therapy, involves creating micro-channels in the skin using tiny needles. These micro-channels stimulate the skin’s natural healing process, promoting the production of collagen and elastin, two essential components of healthy skin. We do microneedling using an electric microneedling device. The treatment is performed at varying depths depending on the desired results.
Fraxel, on the other hand, is a laser treatment that uses fractional laser technology to create microscopic injury to the skin. Like microneedling, Fraxel also promotes collagen production and skin rejuvenation. It delivers precise heat energy to the deeper layers of the skin. You can use fraxel to treat a variety of skin concerns. These include fine lines and wrinkles, acne scars, and pigmentation issues.
What to choose?
While both treatments can be effective for addressing a range of skin concerns, there are some key differences between microneedling and Fraxel that are worth considering.
Microneedling is typically less expensive than Fraxel, making it a more accessible option for those on a budget. It is also less invasive than Fraxel, as it does not involve the use of heat or lasers. This makes it a good option for those with sensitive skin or those who are concerned about the potential side effects of more invasive treatments.
However, while microneedling is less invasive than Fraxel, it may not be as effective for more severe skin concerns. Fraxel can penetrate deeper into the skin, delivering more significant results for those with deeper wrinkles, more severe scarring, or more stubborn pigmentation issues. Fraxel can also be more customizable than microneedling, as it allows for greater control over the depth and intensity of the treatment.
Another consideration when choosing between microneedling and Fraxel is the recovery time. While both treatments can cause some redness and irritation immediately following the procedure, Fraxel typically requires a longer recovery time than microneedling. Patients undergoing Fraxel may experience peeling, flaking, and dryness in the days following the treatment, and may need to avoid sun exposure and certain skincare products for a period of time. Microneedling, on the other hand, typically requires less downtime and can be performed without the need for extensive aftercare.
Anti-aging benefits
When it comes to anti-aging benefits, both microneedling and Fraxel can be effective at reducing the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles. Microneedling is particularly effective at stimulating collagen production, which can help to improve the overall texture and tone of the skin. Fraxel, on the other hand, can be more effective at targeting deeper wrinkles and other signs of aging, as it is able to penetrate more deeply into the skin.
In addition to anti-aging benefits, both microneedling and Fraxel can be effective at addressing hyperpigmentation issues such as sun damage or melasma. Microneedling can help to reduce the appearance of dark spots and patches by promoting cellular turnover and increasing the effectiveness of topical treatments. Fraxel, on the other hand, can help to break up pigmentation at the deeper levels of the skin, making it a more effective option for more severe cases of hyperpigmentation.
For a no-obligation consultation, you can make an appointment by contacting Bahati Aesthetics at info@bahati.co.za or clicking here to send an email for more information.
You can also follow us on our social channels: Facebook / Instagram
You can also subscribe to our newsletter here
